JIPYONG LLC

The inauguration of Mr. Suk-yeol Yoon as the twentieth president of the Republic of Korea took place on May 10, resulting in a shift in governing party from the Democratic Party to the People Power Party.  It is anticipated that this political shift will bring about changes in various public policies.

In a policy booklet published by the People Power Party (the “Policy Booklet”) as part of President Yoon’s election campaign, President Yoon announced that one of his goals is to realize a “fair society” and, as a specific means to achieve such goal, he has pledged to enhance public policies relating to fair trade.

In this article, we have reiterated some of the main features of fair trade policies included in the Policy Booklet in order to assess the anticipated changes in fair trade policies during the new presidency.


1. Regulation of Online Platforms

President Yoon’s position with respect to the regulation of online platforms as stated in the Policy Booklet may lead to the reconsideration of online platform regulations promoted during the previous regime.



Since the announcement of the “Eradication of Unfair Trade among Online Platforms and Fair Digital Economy Policy” by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”) in June 2020, there had been discussions for the enactment of legislation regulating unfair trade practices of online platform operators against platform-using businesses.  However, the proposed bill was not passed at the ad-hoc national assembly held in January 2022.

With the proposed bill not having been passed during the previous regime, the current regulation of online platforms may be reconsidered in its entirety under the new regime’s basic direction of “self-regulation/minimized government regulation.”  For example, new legislation may lean toward curtailing the scope of business providers subject to regulation or reducing the minimum contract terms an online platform operator should include in its agreements with third parties.  Even further, the possibility that no additional legislation will be enacted, on the basis that current fair trade law is adequate to regulate online platform providers, cannot be ruled out completely.


2. Discretionary Power of the KFTC to File a Criminal Complaint

The KFTC may retain its discretionary power to file a criminal complaint, but with limits put in place by adjusting the roles of the KFTC and the prosecutor’s office.



However, while he was a candidate for Prosecutor General, President Yoon stated in his response to the National Assembly’s questionnaires that, “the repeal of the KFTC’s discretionary power to file a criminal complaint is necessary in order to achieve a fair economic order, such as the deterrence of hardcore cartel activities which constitute a severe crime.”  Thus, there still is a possibility that the KFTC’s discretionary criminal complaint filing power may be repealed.

The Policy Booklet’s pledge to operate the KFTC’s discretionary power to file a criminal complaint (the “Discretionary Filing System”) in balance with the system of request for filing by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, etc. (the “Requested Filing System”) is noteworthy.  Considering the on-going heated debate between opponents of the Requested Filing System who argue that it is abused to the extent there are growing management uncertainties among corporates and its proponents who argue that the Requested Filing System has been well-managed, it will be interesting to watch how the new regime will operate the Requested Filing System.


3. Regulation of So-Called ‘Power-Imbalanced Relationships’

With respect to regulations on the so-called “power-imbalanced relationship (‘갑을 관계 ’ in Korean),” the Policy Booklet pledged to (i) implement a system to prevent the extortion of technologies belonging to small and medium-sized enterprises (“SMEs”) and (ii) introduce a price linkage system between raw materials and goods or services based thereon.



During the previous regime, the KFTC announced its intent to eradicate the misappropriation of SME technologies by the conglomerates in 2017 and commenced ex officio investigations thereon.  The KFTC has since been continuously regulating a principal’s demand for the submission and misappropriation of the technology data of a contractor/subcontractor (Article 12-3, Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act (the “FTSA”)).  In addition, obligations on conglomerates with respect to technology data were enhanced with the enactment of the Act on the Promotion of Collaborative Cooperation between Large Enterprises and Small-Medium Enterprises (the “PCCA”).  This has led to growing concerns from the business sector.

Considering the new regime’s pledge in the Policy Booklet – to enhance regulations on the extortion of technologies – it is possible that the current direction of KFTC enforcement, such as large-scale ex officio investigations on the demand and misappropriation of technology data, may be maintained during the new regime.

In addition, a new system may be introduced to allow supply prices to reflect changes in the price of raw materials.  The FTSA and PCCA already provide that a contractor/subcontractor may request an adjustment of the contract price if there is a change in the supply cost.

The policy pledged in the Policy Booklet appears to take a further step by (i) placing an obligation on the principal to respond to a request for supply price adjustment and (ii) introducing a price linkage system to automatically reflect a change in the raw material price in the supply price.


4. Regulation of Large Business Groups

With respect to regulations on large business groups, the new regime may narrow the scope of ‘familial relationships’ encompassing ‘persons related to the same person’ (which is a Korean legal concept used in the determination of an affiliated relationship) which currently includes blood relatives within the sixth degree and other relatives by affinity within the fourth degree.



The current scope of familial relationships encompassing persons related to the same person include blood relatives within the sixth degree and other relatives by affinity within the fourth degree (Item ga, Subparagraph 1 of Article 4, Enforcement Decree of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act).  The KFTC has internally acknowledged the need for reconsideration of the scope of familial relationships.  As the scope of persons related to the same person is specified by presidential order, a policy change may be anticipated in the near future.